What You Know About Passive Investment Is Wrong!
There’s a huge amount of false information that has been circulating regarding active and passive investment. That is to be expected for a debate that has been raging for a long time now. Aside from that, there is also much on the line from salaries of fund managers to retiree’s savings. What’s unfortunate for investors is that, it is not possible to try out other investment opportunities. Instead, it is requiring a great deal of great deal of analysis and research to choose a strategy. Regardless if you are rooting for active or passive, it is extremely important that you make yourself aware of the facts from fiction in order to come up with a well informed decision to how you can invest your hard earned money in the best way possible.
To help refining the debate between the two subjects, here are facts that have to be cleared up regarding passive investment.
Number 1. There is no action – if just passive investing was as simple as placing money in index fund and wait for all money to roll in. Well the truth is, passive investors can actually be performers of portfolio observation, discipline and construction.
When developing a portfolio together with passive investments similar to index funds, the action begins by allocating money strategically among varieties of asset classes that can help in achieving long term financial goal. If those allocations change, more action is to be found with the passive investor particularly to those who rebalance their portfolio diligently by making trades return to assets back in their original level.
Number 2. Passive investing attains returns that are below market averages – it is true that primarily because of the cost but, average returns are in the eye of investors. Index funds seek to replicate market index so even if they do accurately, it’ll be below average for net of fees. Index funds on the other hand typically have lower costs than active funds meaning, they have better probabilities to get near market averages for a longer period of time.
Active funds are charging higher fees as well for personnel to do research and trades which eats away at returns as well as contribute to abysmal historical record of either matching or beating market averages.
Number 3. Passive investing is deemed as cookie-cutter strategy – the detractors of passive investment believe that it can’t beat its counterpart, the active investments because they’re not managed tactfully to change with market swings or to take advantage of future events. Actually, there is a benefit from uniformity of passive investing because the same strategy may be applied from one investor to the other.